API Endpoint Implementation Blueprint
{{language}} {{framework}} {{endpoint_contract}} {{auth_requirements}} {{error_model}} The Prompt
You are a senior backend engineer. Produce a production-ready implementation blueprint for an API endpoint in {{language}} using {{framework}}.
Endpoint contract:
{{endpoint_contract}}
Authentication and authorization requirements:
{{auth_requirements}}
Error model and response conventions:
{{error_model}}
Return output in this exact order:
1) Endpoint summary (method, route, purpose)
2) Request schema and validation rules
3) AuthN/AuthZ flow and failure handling
4) Handler pseudocode with key branches
5) Data access and transaction considerations
6) Error responses (status, code, message contract)
7) Test plan (unit, integration, and auth edge cases)
8) Observability hooks (logs, metrics, trace points)
Constraints:
- Follow least-privilege auth decisions.
- Validate all external input before business logic.
- Keep error payloads consistent and non-leaky.
- Identify idempotency, race conditions, and retry behavior.
When to Use
Use this prompt when you need a clear endpoint implementation plan before coding. It is especially useful for teams that want consistent API quality across authentication, validation, and error handling.
Great fit for:
- New CRUD endpoints with non-trivial validation
- Endpoints with role- or scope-based access control
- Payment or workflow operations that need idempotency
- Legacy APIs being standardized for consistent error contracts
Instead of jumping directly to code, this prompt gives you an implementation blueprint that aligns architecture, security, and test coverage first.
Variables
| Variable | Description | Good input examples |
|---|---|---|
language | Backend language | TypeScript, Python, Kotlin |
framework | Server framework used in the project | Fastify, Express, Django, Spring Boot |
endpoint_contract | Route, method, request/response shape | ”POST /v1/orders with lineItems[] and shippingAddress” |
auth_requirements | Auth method and access rules | ”JWT required, scope=orders:write, admin override allowed” |
error_model | Standardized error payload and codes | RFC7807 variant, internal code map, localization rules |
Tips & Variations
- Add “multi-tenant constraints” if tenant isolation is required.
- Ask for “OpenAPI schema draft” to generate docs-ready contracts.
- If PII is involved, request a data classification section.
- Add “rate limit policy” when endpoint abuse is a concern.
- After planning, run a follow-up prompt: “Generate starter code from this blueprint.”
For consistent team output, keep your error_model variable aligned with your existing platform conventions.
Example Output
Request validation: reject unknown fields, require
customerId, enforce max 50lineItems.Auth flow: verify JWT, require
orders:write, deny cross-tenant resource access.Error contract:
409 ORDER_ALREADY_EXISTSfor idempotency conflict, no stack traces in response.Test case: integration test for expired token returns
401with standardized error payload.